Search for: "Ex parte Thomas." Results 1 - 20 of 1,196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Ex-Congressman Asks 11th Circuit to Toss Six-Figure Campaign Finance Penalty Courthouse News Service – Kayla Gogging | Published: 4/16/2024 Former U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
How the No Labels 2024 Presidential Campaign Failed to Launch MSN – Ken Thomas and Kristina Peterson (Wall Street Journal) | Published: 4/4/2024 No Labels, the centrist group which has sought to field a third-party presidential bid, is abandoning efforts to create a “unity ticket” aiming to win the White House. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by fjhinojosa
Hawaii was cited in the following article: Seth Barrett Tillman, What Court (If Any) Decided Ex Parte Merryman? [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The rules follow revelations that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas had not disclosed luxury trips paid for by a wealthy benefactor. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Surveillance Airbnb has banned indoor surveillance devices, including cameras and audio recorders, in its rental properties as part of an update to security policies. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
  Instead, as I (and many others) predicted after the oral argument, the Court used the Anderson line of cases as only one part of a newfangled federalism-based constraint on the ability of states to “enforce” Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment with respect to federal offices. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media On 31 January 2024, Part 10 of the Online Safety Act came into force. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Defendants often rely in part on a study conducted by two professors at Michigan State University. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
<by the constitution>”); the Wilson/Rutledge draft for the Committee of Detail (“and appoint (Officers in all Cases) . . . not otherwise provided for by this Constitution”); the draft constitution finally approved by the Committee of Detail and circulated to the delegates on August 6 (“and shall appoint officers in all cases not otherwise provided for by this Constitution”); and, perhaps most significantly, the September 4 report of the Committee on Postponed… [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
  This was the point of Justice Thomas’ very first question to Jason Murray, and it was a recurring theme throughout the argument. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Luxury Spending, Internal Strife Leave NRA Staggering Into 2024 Election Anchorage Daily News – Beth Reinhard and Sylvia Foster-Frau (Washington Post) | Published: 2/4/2024 In 2016, the National Rifle Association (NRA) endorsed helped catapult Donald Trump to the White House with $31 million in campaign spending. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
 at 836, of effecting such an extraconstitutional condition, where that ballot exclusion will have the “likely effect of handicapping” the ability of the excluded persons from holding the office, id.This argument is elaborated upon and sharpened in Part I of the amicus brief for Senator Steve Daines, filed by Jones Day.As applied to what Colorado has done here (or what it would do if it removed Trump’s name from the primary ballot, which in… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
 at 836, of effecting such an extraconstitutional condition, where that ballot exclusion will have the “likely effect of handicapping” the ability of the excluded persons from holding the office, id.This argument is elaborated upon and sharpened in Part I of the amicus brief for Senator Steve Daines, filed by Jones Day.As applied to what Colorado has done here (or what it would do if it removed Trump’s name from the primary ballot, which in… [read post]