Search for: "Express Company v. Railroad Company"
Results 121 - 140
of 222
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
The Second Circuit held – in the context of asbestos mass tort litigation – that a company with “continuous and systematic” business in a state (Connecticut) can’t be sued by out-of-state litigation tourist plaintiffs over out-of-state asbestos exposure. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:08 am
PSEG Long Island LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Our second example involves a cook employed by a catering company who was assigned to a railroad gang in rural Saskatchewan. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:23 am
Neither Rule 68 nor the 19th century railroad tax cases California v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:15 pm
Carol Sachs v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 12:32 pm
In a much anticipated decision in Glatt v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:34 am
” In Glatt v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 7:18 pm
The other employee’s claims failed for similar reasons (Burks v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:20 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has vacated an intern-friendly decision in Glatt v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
On July 2, 2015, in Glatt v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
On July 2, 2015, in Glatt v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 9:02 am
The plaintiffs in Glatt v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:32 am
Railroad Company, 101 U.S. 557 (1879) (Statutes in derogation of the common law cannot be construed as changing the common law unless those changes are specifically expressed in the statute. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:23 am
MAPCO Express, Inc.). [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:49 am
Quintanilla v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:24 am
COMPENSATORY DAMAGES; BEING SENT HOME FOR EXPRESSING SAFETY AND HEALTH CONCERNS SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT NOMINAL AWARD OF $500 FOR EMOTIONAL DISTRESS In Jackson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 9:35 am
., much like railroads and other monopolies as far back as the 19th century. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
The court reiterated what it had said in Henderson:[I]n Henderson, disposing of a contention that the drug company would be liable, even if not negligent, if the drug was not safe on theory of a breach of warranty, this Court held that, unless the action is based upon an express warranty, an action against a drug company must be ex delicto and not ex contractu, the action being based upon a breach of duty imposed by law. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am
And so Justice Breyer asked how a judge could assess whether there is discrimination without knowing where the money is to go: what if the trucking companies paid a special tax to aid railroads? [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:17 am
The style of the case is, Truck Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
