Search for: "Ey v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 8,227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 9:52 am by immigrationprof
Julianne Hing on ColorLines looks at the possible impacts of a Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:16 am by Texas RioGrande Legal Aid
Last Updated: July 12, 2011 Press Release: Valley Migrant Worker Sues Iowa Residents Over Alleged Hate Crime July 12, 2011 PHOTO: Rafael Trevino (eye) July 12, 2011 PHOTO: Rafael Trevino (face) July 12, 2011 First Amended Complaint United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, Western Division July 12, 2011 [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 8:00 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” In the eyes of the Internal Revenue Service, though, it is also a church, with Perkins as its religious leader…” [read post]
21 May 2013, 3:33 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Paul last week.This is why all eyes are on Washington, D.C. and our SCOTUS, where release of the much-anticipated opinion in Hollingsworth v Perry is imminent as the High Court's term comes to a close next month. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 6:08 am by Jeff Gamso
  Here's Justice Stevens from his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 11:52 am by Stacy
It would also require anyone sending out more than 25 demand letters in a year to register with the attorney general’s office—no doubt an unpleasant prospect for any patent assertion entity casting an eye on Nebraska companies given the present hostility in such office. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 7:09 am by Jeremy Telman
By Peter Greenberg - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0 Writing as I do from Oklahoma, home state to the Bob Dylan Archive, Levy v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 10:02 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Jeannie Suk (Harvard University - Harvard Law School) has posted 'The Look in His Eyes': The Story of State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 1:02 pm by Cannabis Law Group
Since the right of California cannabis delivery services was cemented late last year with the state supreme court’s ruling in County of Santa Cruz v. [read post]