Search for: "Eyler v. Eyler" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2007, 5:11 am
Eyler, Jr.From the official headnote:ZONING -Maryland Code Art. 66B, which empowers certain local jurisdictions to adopt zoning codes, does not require a special exception use to be in strict compliance with a local comprehensive plan. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 3:23 am
Eyler, Jr.From the official headnote:ZONING - CRITICAL AREA PROGRAMAmendments to State and county critical area laws, absent an express statement as to prospective or retrospective application, apply to matters pending and not yet decided by the agency responsible for de novo decision making.When a board of appeals denies an application for a variance, and the property owner has a legal right to build on the property, but cannot do so without a variance, it is not sufficient for the Board… [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 3:58 pm
The LLC also engaged in unfair and deceptive trade practices, in violation of the Maryland Consumer Protection Act ("CPA"), by failing to disclose its unregistered status in its contracts and promotional materials, thereby falsely implying to consumers that the LLC was lawfully authorized to sell new homes to consumers.The members of the LLC were properly held jointly and severally liable for the LLC's statutory violations for two reasons.First, they violated the prior consent order,… [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:09 pm
A shocking example of this is found in the facts of United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 9:14 pm by Dan Flynn
The federal Western District Court for Texas calls the United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:48 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Judge Eyler pointed this out in his dissent; "[e]xceeding the speeding limit does not constitute actionable negligence unless it is a proximate cause of injury or damage, " citing Myers v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:48 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Judge Eyler pointed this out in his dissent; "[e]xceeding the speeding limit does not constitute actionable negligence unless it is a proximate cause of injury or damage, " citing Myers v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals decided a new malpractice case in Wantz v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:21 am
The Court of Special Appeals of Maryland has reversed the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City in Fisher V. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals decided a new malpractice case in Wantz v. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:33 am
(It should be noted that Judge Eyler filed a dissenting opinion). [read post]