Search for: "Eyre v. Eyre"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2022, 9:24 am
., Special Eyre Rolls of Hugh Bigod 1258-1260 V. 1 & 2 (London: Selden Society, 2021). [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 11:04 am
Eyre, No. 08-1627 (10/27/08). [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 10:47 pm
Though this case, Phillips v Eyre, was mainly concerned with constitutional issues, Willes J laid down a rule for choice of law in tort which endured for nearly a century before it was finally superseded. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm
"Tom Frost (University of Leicester) has posted a "teaching resource" of interest: "Phillips v Eyre – A Study of Constitutional Law and Empire. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Eyre J’s judgment also addressed the later (controversial) decision of Internet Broadcasting Corporation Ltd & others v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am
The first, Godfrey v Demon Internet ([2001] EWHC QB 201) and the second, Bunt v Tilley ([2006] EWHC 407 (QB)) involved the liability of ISPs, the third Metropolitan International Schools Limited v Design Technica Corp. ([2009] EWHC 1765 (QB)), the liability of Google for results generated by its search engine. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 12:30 am
Here is the abstract:As is well-known, the Court of King’s Bench in Marshall v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:21 am
The judge carried out an analysis of the above authorities, and also the Court of Appeal’s decision in The Quartz Hill Consolidated Gold Mining Company v Eyre (1883) 11 QBD 674 CA. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:46 pm
In this week’s case (Johnson v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 11:13 am
Strauch v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 1:19 pm
In Chohan v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 11:01 pm
Eyre [Philips v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:00 am
Tyler v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 5:25 am
—Richard Eyre 1Stromquist v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:08 pm
Right to liberty: Entick v Carrington (1765) Prohibition on retrospective liability: Philips v Eyre (1870) 6 QB 1 (see our recent post on this principle) Prohibition of torture has long been a “constitutional principle”, according to Lord Bingham in A & Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 2 AC 221 The right to fair trail, defined in the Magna Carter as “due process of the law” (Chapter 29 of the 1354 version… [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:19 am
(In two later applications, RM v UK (no. 29080/22) and HN v UK (no. 29084/22)), the Court also decided to apply an interim measure under Rule 39 staying their removal.) [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 6:32 am
The original case was heard by Mr Recorder Eyre sitting in Hereford County Court and it was this decision that was the subject of the appeal. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 6:45 am
(Image courtesy of Flickr user Wandering Eyre pursuant to Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 license.) [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:18 am
King (Annex KF 228 .K36 K56 2006) Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 12:47 am
: on the recent decisions in Onuoha v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust and Kovalkovs v 2 Sisters Food Group Limited. [read post]
