Search for: "Ezersky v. Ezersky" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2012, 2:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The cause of action alleging a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 fails to state a cause of action, since plaintiffs do not allege that defendants engaged in any deceptive conduct during a pending proceeding in which plaintiffs were parties (see Stanski v Ezersky, 228 AD2d 311, 313 [*2][1996], lv denied 89 NY2d 805 [1996]). [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Sun Graphics Corp. v Levy, Davis & Maher, LLP, 94 AD3d 669, 669 [I st Dept 2012], citing Stanski v Ezersky, 228 AD2d 311, 313 [1st Dept 1996].) [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ezersky, 228 A.D.2d 311, 313, 644 N.Y.S.2d 220, 223 (1st Dep't 1996). [read post]