Search for: "FAILS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS"
Results 21 - 40
of 452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am
FTTJ Blundell observed that her first ILR application failed owing to the ineptitude of her college. [read post]
29 May 2011, 6:40 am
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, (11th Cir., May 25, 2011), the 11th Circuit upheld a district court's dismissal of a claim by a prisoner that he was denied access to kosher meals and to Jewish religious services and observance of Jewish holidays. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am
Her fresh application failed. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 2:53 am
The court, however, had to determine the correct interpretation of the instructions, which was a question of law. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
Secretary v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 3:16 am
Equally, in Mehmet Eren v Turkey [2008] ECHR 1070, the Strasbourg Court’s approach coincided with these cases as did the relevant Guidelines on the Judicial Approach to Expert Medical Evidence and the Home Secretary’s instruction Medico-Legal Reports from the Helen Bamber Foundation and the Medical Foundation Medico-Legal Report Service. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm
This was an appeal against a deportation decision by the Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
Not only does it seem correct as a matter of principle, but also the lack of a lawful power to detain is likely, without more, to give rise to practical difficulties. [read post]
Case Comment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
31 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
The appeal concerned the correct approach of the appellate tribunal where the Home Office finds that an EEA national lawfully resident in the UK should be removed because of an abuse of rights. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
Some caution is appropriate however because apart from AP – whose case can proceed in the UT on a correct interpretation of the law if necessary – all the other appellants failed in their appeals. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
Bank N.A. v Logan Estates, LLC [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am
The FTT allowed Pereira’s appeal but entirely failed to consider the question whether it was unreasonable for him to leave the UK. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:23 am
On 7 March 2012, the Supreme Court gave judgment in seven linked cases, now known as W (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:50 pm
MA (Somalia) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2010] UKSC 49. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
This authority has been delegated, by the president, to the secretary of defense and further delegated to the secretary of the Army. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 4:45 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Asylum tribunal must think properly about private life Asylum seekers cannot be forced to lie about their political beliefs HJ (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 11:00 pm
Shirin Jisha v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 2043 (Admin) – Read judgment When is a human rights claim a human rights claim in an immigration context? [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am
The Queen on the application of Naik v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1546 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:27 am
TN & MA (Afghanistan) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 2-5 March 2015. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:31 am
R (on the application of ZO (Somalia) and others) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2010] UKSC 36 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled that the UK must provide minimum standards to asylum seekers, including the right to work, whether or not their first asylum application has failed. [read post]
