Search for: "FARRELL SMITH"
Results 81 - 100
of 103
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2009, 8:38 pm
 Smith’s file, leaves no doubt that the plaintiff’s lumbar spine was the chief area of treatment throughout the many sessions. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 10:24 pm
District Court Judge Steve Jones also ordered Adam Smith to pay $44,000 restitution and a $25,000 fine. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
Justice Smith, writing for the majority, in Sam v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
There were also several resolved complaints, including: Mr Charles Tubbs v Daily Mail, No clause specified, 29/04/2013; Dr John Little v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/04/2013; Mrs Deborah Farrell v That’s Life, Clause 1, 25/04/2012; Jessica Westwood v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Neil Turner v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Ms Judy Gibbons v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Mrs Sadie Collis v The Sun, Clause 1,… [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
On 11 December 2019 Julian Knowles J handed down judgment in the case Kirkegaard v Smith [2019] EWHC 3393 (QB). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Four of the six judges who heard the argument (Judge Smith recused himself) questioned the attorneys in Roni, with Chief Judge Lippman being the most active inquisitor. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 7:24 pm
Farrell, that a trial judge should determine whether the defendant has breached the standard of care before resolving issues of causation. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
IN ADMIRALTY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON MAINTENANCE AND CURE This matter came on for an evidentiary hearing, before the Court, sitting without a jury, on May 14, 2015. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Smith , No. 08-1477 Sentence for distribution of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant defendant a continuance for another chance to present expert testimony; 2) the district court correctly applied 18 U.S.C. sec. 3553 (a) when sentencing defendant, and did not fail to adequately address the factors set forth in the statute; and 3) there is no evidence that the district court's tangential statements about early… [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 4:55 am
Singer; JD 2000 Harvard University; ; Colorado Supreme Court; Civil Procedure, Judicial Process New England Law Tigran Eldred; JD 1990 Fordham University; Lawyering Program New York University; United States Court of Appeals; Criminal Law, Professional Responsibility New York Law School Melynda Barnhart; JD 2001 Northeastern University; LLM 2009 New York University, LLM 2010 Temple University; Abraham Freedman Fellow Temple University; Legal Research and Writing, Immigration Notre Dame University… [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Farrell, 560 F.Supp. 219, 226. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 9:16 pm
, Kos, McCain’s Double-Talk Express Rolls On John Farrell, US News (!) [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Farrell, 560 F.Supp. 219, 226. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:37 pm
By Michael Diaz, Jr. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
In honor of International Women's Day, a list of some films that feature female lawyers and judges.A la folie, pas du tout (2002). [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
In honor of International Women's Day, a list of some films that feature female lawyers and judges.A la folie, pas du tout (2002). [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 9:31 am
Jordan Smith of the Austin Chronicle has a new article on the case of Jeff Wood. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Nussbaum (1) Bernard-Henry Lévy (3) Bert Parks (1) Bertrand Russell (1) Bessie Smith (1) Best of the Web (7) bestiality (14) Beta Rube (1) betamax3000 (18) Beth (the commenter) (9) Bette Davis (14) Bette Midler (1) Betty Friedan (8) Betty White (1) Beyonce (18) Bhutan (2) Bianca Jagger (1) Bible (40) Biddy Martin (13) biden (177) Biden gaffes (21) Biff (1) big and small (5) Big Government sounds like a creepy stalker (10) Big Hollywood (1) Big Mike (1) bigotry (22) biking (160)… [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 11:41 am
Virginia must be the only State (of which I am aware) in which there is no automatic right to appeal a judgment in a civil case. [read post]
