Search for: "FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Public Service Co." Results 1 - 20 of 664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2018, 12:26 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
This expert analysis examines the court’s rationale in Cyan, the impact the ruling is likely to have on […] The post The Impact of Cyan On Public Companies and the D&O Insurance Marketplace, Westlaw appeared first on Kaufman Dolowich Voluck LLP. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
This case adds more ammunition and facts to support the perceptions noted in All Insurance Agencies Admit Insurance Company Claims Service Has Materially Deteriorated Over the Last Three Years. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The German Federal High Court of Justice has ruled in a landmark decision known as ARAG v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:01 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
The filed rate doctrine is an important concept that comes into play in many consumer class actions, including those against public utilities, telecommunications providers, and insurers, that challenge the amounts charged by a regulated provider for its services. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In a case involving multiple ghosts of long lost companies, a judge in federal court in Manhattan has held that excess D&O insurers do not have a duty to “drop down” to fill the gaps in coverage caused by the insolvency of underlying insurers. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:58 am by Chip Merlin
Nothing in the federal code requires the federal government to place the name of public adjusters or restoration contractors on checks for payment. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 11:52 am by Kevin LaCroix
Astrellas made charitable donations to charity programs that helped patients with the health insurance co-pays. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 12:54 am
Insurance Company of North America and INA Reinsurance Company (“INA”) reinsured Public Service Mutual Insurance Company (“PSMIC”) pursuant to a series of excess of loss reinsurance contracts, effective from 1971 to 1986 (the “Reinsurance Contracts”). [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:45 am by Sansone / Lauber Trial Lawyers
St Louis Public Service Co., 368 S.W. 2d 361 (1963), running a stop sign, no headlights at night is erratic driving  thus allowing testimony from medical records stating alcohol on breath to be admissible at trial. [read post]