Search for: "FEDERAL MOGUL CORPORATION" Results 61 - 80 of 97
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2011, 9:10 am by Frank Pasquale
Between 2006 and 2007, Mexican communications mogul Carlos Slim Helu grew his fortune by $19 billion, a sum equivalent to about 2.5 percent of Mexico's GDP. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm by John Floyd
He got a job with a number of law firms in Iowa and Minnesota, even becoming “corporate counsel” for a national grocery company called SuperValu. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Casino Mogul Steve Wynn Must File as Foreign Agent, U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm by Marie Louise
Federal-Mogul Corporation (Docket Report) Siemens – Rotary clubbed: Siemens hit with water filter patent suit: Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies Support v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 7:42 am by Chris Castle
Songwriters can tell you this is a nightmarish process at the federal level–and by the way songwriters, you’re next. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Sanders has vowed to shake up how the influence world does business, with proposals to ban donations from federal lobbyists and corporations and to prohibit the corporate funding of party conventions. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:45 am by Gordon Todd
Federal Election Commission, much more than the decision actually holds. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 9:11 am by Frank Pasquale
Between 2006 and 2007, Mexican communications mogul Carlos Slim Helu grew his fortune by $19 billion, a sum equivalent to about 2.5 percent of Mexico’s GDP. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
HemCon, Inc (Patents Post-Grant) (Patently-O) (Reexamination Alert) (IPBiz) CAFC: Construing claim constructions: Cordis Corporation v Boston Scientific (Patently-O) (IPBiz) Kimberly-Clark: CAFC loses an opportunity to address law of preliminary injunctions: Kimberly Clark v First Quality Baby Products (IPBiz) The Federal Circuit’s rare opportunity to protect the public from agency misconduct: In re Jeff Lovin (Patently-O) District Court C D California: Another false marking… [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 12:37 am
The 2007 Chief Legal Officer Survey by Altman Weil and LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell also shows that corporate legal departments are more inclined to sever relationships with law firms. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
While many American corporations donate to candidates and campaigns, some do not disclose it. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:24 am by Kevin LaCroix
 In August, automobile racing mogul Bernie Ecclestone agreed to pay $100 million to secure the discontinuance of bribery proceedings pending against him in Germany. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 4:59 pm
He invoked the Federal Constitution's privilege against self-incrimination and refused to cooperate. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Federal law requires American citizens to disclose any contacts with the government or media in the U.S. at the direction or request of foreign politicians or government officials. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 10:24 pm by Jim Sedor
His termination could raise questions about whether towns and corporations can dismiss employees for offensive speech, which is protected by the Constitution. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 11:43 pm
Chesterton Company Borg Warner Automotive Bell & Gossett Company Continental Can Company Flexitallic Gasket Company Garlock Sealing Technologies Federal-Mogul John Deere Industrial Equipment Company Goulds Pumps, Inc. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Arab Bank PLC that corporations can be held liable under the Alien Tort Act, the Supreme Court can “hold financial institutions accountable for failing to detect unethical financial transactions. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 11:36 am by escottjohnson
  When I first posted about the HONtroversy, I couldn’t recall another instance where a trademark registrant had voluntarily surrendered federal registrations in response to community protests. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am by Kelly
Federal-Mogul Corp (Docket Report) District Court N D Ohio: Plaintiff’s choice of forum for false marking claims given little weight where Plaintiff was formed specifically to pursue litigation: Unique Product Solutions, Ltd. v. [read post]