Search for: "FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. INNOVATIVE DESIGNS, INC."
Results 1 - 20
of 206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2014, 5:18 am
Pati–Port, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 6:15 am
Crocs, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:39 pm
International Trade Commission William Barr, former General Counsel, Verizon Communications Inc. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 10:31 pm
The sidebar includes a link to Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:32 am
| Tourism and Culture in the Age of Innovation | Lord Neuberger's most difficult case | US Senate passes Trade Secrets Act Never too late 90 [week ending on Sunday 3 April] – Book review: "IP and Other Things" by Sir Robin Jacob| Book review: "Trade Marks Law" by Glen Gibbons| IPKat Post #10,00 | Taser International Inc. v SC Gate 4 Business SRL and Others |Two Book Reviews:… [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:43 am
The STRONG Patents Act states that the sending of patent notice letters in bad faith is an unfair or deceptive trade practice under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:00 am
| Tourism and Culture in the Age of Innovation | Lord Neuberger's most difficult case | US Senate passes Trade Secrets Act Never too late 90 [week ending on Sunday 3 April] – Book review: "IP and Other Things" by Sir Robin Jacob| Book review: "Trade Marks Law" by Glen Gibbons| IPKat Post #10,00 | Taser International Inc. v SC Gate 4 Business SRL and Others |Two Book Reviews:… [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Sarah Burstein: Reichman is worried that designs can’t satisfy nonobviousness—but the Federal Circuit has removed constraints.Reichman: the Fed Cir has improved it; but still, nonobviousness means that people don’t apply—the lawyers tell the designer there’s no chance. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:40 am
Cardozo School of Law) On March 25, 2013, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
And 10,000 more are coming…* CJEU on taser, ahm, tacit prorogation of jurisdictionMark pens of Taser International Inc. v SC Gate 4 Business SRL and Others (Case C-175/15), a decision where the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) addressed the issue of whether Article 24 of Brussels I Regulation applies in cases where one party is domiciled in a non-EU Member State. * Two Book Reviews: European Law Design and The Changing European PatentDavid reviews… [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:24 pm
April 17, 2007); Magical Mile, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
Clothing Collection, Inc. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:55 am
District Court for the Northern District of Texas in Mary Kay, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 10:01 am
Federal Trade Commission released 2013 Annual Highlights setting out its priorities over the past year, which generally include promoting online privacy and data security, fostering competition in high-tech industries and healthcare and protecting children and other vulnerable consumers from fraud. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 12:21 pm
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:48 am
The cases appear to be the first of their kind relating to the purchase of shares in the pre-IPO market.In the federal court case, SEC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:20 am
For example, in Qualcomm’s 2019 Ninth Circuit opening brief in its litigation against the Federal Trade Commission, Qualcomm contended its “OEM licenses are efficient[.] [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 7:18 am
The Commission claims that the defendants induced customers to invest in a pooled commodity fund that purported to employ a high-frequency, algorithmic trading strategy, executed by a computer trading program called “Jigsaw. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:43 pm
See Solis v. [read post]
