Search for: "FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. MATCH GROUP, INC."
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2012, 11:48 am
The cases appear to be the first of their kind relating to the purchase of shares in the pre-IPO market.In the federal court case, SEC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:31 am
The most significant case is Advanced Energy United, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
”) [oilstatespetition] Jury Trial: Nanovapor Fuels Group, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:13 pm
In Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 10:17 pm
The Supreme Court held 5 to 4 today in Altria Group, Inc, v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Investment groups, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) have begun filing a host of lawsuits across the federal district courts, five major lawsuits alone in the months of September 2022 and October 2022. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am
Last year, a federal study determined that professional image examiners matched faces more accurately than untrained students — providing the first scientific basis for a photograph comparison field. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:29 pm
Marine Bancorporation, 418 U.S. 602, 618 (1974)).Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act empowers the Federal Trade Commission to seek preliminary injunctive relief in order to prevent a merger until it can adjudicate the merger’s legality in an administrative proceeding, provided the agency has “reason to believe” that the merger will violate the antitrust laws. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
Friboi (Class 46)Commission keeps the GIs coming (Class 46) General Court confirms no likelihood of confusion between PPT and earlier Portuguese mark PPTV (Class 46) EU to be sued over maintaining secrecy in trade talks with India (Spicy IP) This little PGI went … all the way to the European Commission – Cornish Pastry (IPKat) Germany German Federal Court of Justice confirms application of Comvik/Hitachi approach (Kluwer Patent Blog) Hong Kong Hong… [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
These platforms match orders in crypto security tokens of multiple buyers and sellers using established non-discretionary methods. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
DBC Window Tinting, Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps 10th Avenue Hospitality Group – MARQUEE Nightclub in NY v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
Penguin Group v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 10:07 pm
ONEOK, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 10:10 pm
Not only that, but affirmative statements using descriptions such as "exceptional" run the risk of an action under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (an unfair or deceptive trade practice). [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
This Update focuses on the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division’s (“DOJ”) antitrust enforcement activity over the last year under this Executive Order’s direction.2 For further details on the Executive Order, please see Davis Polk’s prior Client Update regarding issuance of the Executive Order.3 FTC and DOJ have been conducting intensive merger and conduct investigations FTC… [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Accession, Inc. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:04 am
Sutton Group LLC. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP finance),Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsICANN supports Google’s fight against domain-tasting: (Class 46),Global - PatentsSoftware patents and startup innovators: (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property),Co-inventor: yes or no? [read post]