Search for: "FEDERER v. DAVIS"
Results 241 - 260
of 3,415
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 9:21 am
Hilton Davis Chemical Co., 520 U.S. 17 (1997). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
In a part of Bush v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:46 pm
Microsoft v. i4i (On appeal at the Federal Circuit) In the past several years, courts have somewhat weakened patent rights. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:39 am
Chin is a Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis, School of Law, and Miller is Vice Dean and Bilby Professor of Law at the University of Arizona, James E. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:35 pm
SMUG v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 1:13 pm
Judge Davis' order notes that in ResQNet.com, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 12:41 pm
” The question in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 7:26 am
See Borden v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 1:00 am
In September 2007 the Federal Court of Australia ruled on the question of copyright in project homes and plans for them. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:55 pm
Although the Supreme Court in late June, in the case of Obergefell v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:30 am
Seth Davis and Christopher A. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:34 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 9 Cal.3d at p. 65 [recognizing that federal warning-label regulations alone may be insufficient to protect patient safety].) [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 9:15 pm
The Sixth Circuit's ruling yesterday to reverse a below-guideline sentence as unreasonable in US v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 6:07 pm
Davis], the CT Supreme Court rejected the automatic standing rule. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:31 pm
A three-judge federal district court rejected plaintiffs’ challenge to the redistricting plan. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 6:26 am
This essay continues their look into the Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 6:10 am
That is what happened here.The case is Parkview Lounge, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 10:15 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
Although the measure it well intentioned, the federal district court was right in ruling that the measure violates principles of federal supremacy under the Constitution.The granddaddy of federal supremacy rulings is McCulloch v. [read post]
