Search for: "FELTS v. STATE"
Results 41 - 60
of 6,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2013, 7:31 am
A white funeral services employee who was instructed to exclude “ethnic” job candidates and felt forced to resign when her protestations were ignored survived dismissal of her Sec. 1981 retaliation claim (Baker v Kelly Smith, LLC dba Southeast Preneed Services, October 10, 2013, Bucklew, S). [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 4:55 am
In the recent North Carolina Court of Appeals case, Gardner v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am
Indeed Lord Hoffmann, in the minority, felt able to conclude that there was no such emergency. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:11 am
State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 8:56 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
Rohn Padmore, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 12:01 am
State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 10:53 am
Dover Acupuncture, P.C. v State Farm Mut. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 9:21 am
United States last summer, many Computer Fraud and Abuse Act experts felt that the decision avoided the worst interpretations of the CFAA, while consciously leaving most of its practical applications for lower courts to decide later. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
United States wiretapping case decided by the Supreme Court, which had a far-reaching impact still felt today. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 11:20 am
In holding that Congress could not validly abrogate state immunity for copyright infringement, the Fourth Circuit felt itself bound to follow the Court’s earlier decisions. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 7:28 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 10:18 am
I felt a great disturbance in the Force.The New York Times has an editorial (not an op-ed or a column, the newspaper's main editorial representing its position as an institution), headlined Donald Trump Is Right About Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 6:39 am
The case, New York Times v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:58 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:49 am
In Mackey v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
United States wiretapping case decided by the Supreme Court, which had a far-reaching impact still felt today. [read post]
26 May 2007, 3:22 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:48 am
State v. [read post]
