Search for: "FLINN v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:18 pm
In People v Flinn (2009 NY Slip Op 02031 [4th Dept 3/20/09]), a defendant contended that his guilty plea was coerced by County Court's statements concerning the potential terms of incarceration in the event that defendant was convicted following a trial. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
After all, as he House of Lords observed in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, freedom of expression is a right without “an effective rule of law is not possible”. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:44 am by Susan Brenner
Flinn, 521 F.Supp.2d 1097, 1101 (U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am by Graeme Hall
August 8, 2011 Matthew Flinn Filed under: In the news, Roundup [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:40 pm by Graeme Hall
A-S v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 564 (Admin) (17 January 2011): Bizarre “catch-22? [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:31 pm by Sam Murrant
AT v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 42 (07 February 2012). [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am by Melina Padron
 August 8, 2011 by Matthew Flinn | Can you choose an arbitrator on the grounds of his religion? [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
’, 8 August) Matthew Flinn queried our claim that the Protocol fails to meet the requirements of article 3 ECHR. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:31 am by Melina Padron
Second, the Supreme Court will in the near future decide a case on the subject of compensation for miscarriage of justice in the case of R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice. [read post]