Search for: "FLOYD v. STATE" Results 141 - 160 of 833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2010, 1:18 am
On Wednesday Mr Justice Floyd handed down his keenly-awaited ruling in Football Dataco Ltd, The Scottish Premier League Limited, The Scottish Football League Limited and PA Sport UK Limited v Sportradar GmbH & and Sportradar AG [2010] EWHC 2911 (Ch), a sharply-contested battle that took place in the genteel surroundings of the High Court, Chancery Division, for England and Wales. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 9:07 am
The first ten in the first stage are different elements in the relevant state of the art and the eleventh is the conclusion the judge drew from them. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 2:32 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ngyuen, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 585 (18 March 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mayor of London v London Borough of Enfield [2008] EWCA Civ 202 (18 March 2008) LG (Italy) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 190 (18 March 2008) S v Floyd [2008] EWCA Civ 201 (18 March 2008) Housden & Anor v The Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons [2008] EWCA Civ 200 (18 March… [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 10:00 am by Scott Hervey
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently addressed the issue of novelty as an element of an idea theft claim in Wexler v Hasbro. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
On Friday, Floyd LJ gave the leading judgment (with which Patten and Tomlinson LJJ agreed) in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc [2015] EWCA Civ 290. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:13 am
In Lundbeck v Infosint [2011] EWHC 907 (Pat) (IPKat post here), Mr Justice Floyd observed in obiter that, according to the principles of novelty adopted in the UK courts, an overlapping range is novel solely on the basis that it is a narrower selection. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
 Moreover, this is really where it starts to get interesting.In the Court of Appeal decision relating to interim relief before the main trial before Arnold J, Floyd LJ had examined the proper interpretation of Swiss-form, second medical use claims (the present judgment states that this was at the behest of the parties: "The court was invited by both parties at that stage to decide the issue of law so that the parties knew where they stood for the purposes of the… [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
A defamation case against the Court of Appeals of Tennessee for defamatory comments made by a district attorney general came to a head in Floyd Rodney Burns v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:19 pm by Erin Napoleon
The legislation was introduced in response to ongoing nationwide protests against the killing of George Floyd, police brutality and systemic racism in the United States. [read post]