Search for: "FOREST PRODUCTS V US" Results 1 - 20 of 586
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2015, 3:38 pm by John C. Manoog III
One particular drug, an antidepressant manufactured by Forest Pharmaceuticals and commonly known as “Lexapro,” recently came under fire in the case of Marcus v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
The Appeals Court indicates that, "In the event that we conclude that the Roadless Rule complies with the Wilderness Act and NEPA, they ask us to affirm on the alternate grounds that the rule was promulgated in violation of the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act (MUSYA), and also the National Forest Management Act (NFMA). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court has agreed to hear the appeal of Georgia-Pacific (GP) West, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 5:11 am by Asbestos Litigation
Thus in the principle, they cultivate espciesde low transport (puru naked); to follow, banana trees plant and great diversidadede fruitful plants (puru tum); finally, transport introduces forest species degrande (ib) as chestnut-do-Par (Terminalia catappa L) ' ' Essatcnica of traditional forest handling uses natural bare places and ouartificiais between denser forest areas and the open pasture, giving forms to ' ' ilhas' ' that… [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:59 pm by FDABlog HPM
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s December 2009 “false marking” decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:53 pm by randal shaheen
US businesses that use plant-based products, to create paper, lumber, furniture and even certain types of cosmetics, perfumes, and plant-based pharmaceuticals, have reason to be concerned. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 10:51 am by Gene Quinn
These so-called false marking cases arise from 35 USC § 292, and were given new life thanks to a Federal Circuit decision from December of 2009 --- The Forest Group Inc. v. [read post]