Search for: "FORMER EMPLOYEES IBM CORP V US"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 7:40 am
In International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:46 am
For more information, please choose to follow the case further at International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 6:17 am
International Business Machines Corp., June 7, 2016, Rogers, Y.). [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm
International Business Machines Corp., March 10, 2020, Caproni, V.). [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:59 pm
--Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New YorkOpinion Date: 2/16/11Cite: IBM Corp. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 6:45 am
PrecisionFlow Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 12:58 pm
Waldera Seyfarth Synopsis: In Rusis, et al. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:05 am
At a hearing in February 2009, counsel to Mattel conveyed that Mattel was interested in settling the litigation and that there had been some activity on this front.In International Business Machines Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 7:03 am
The Seventh Circuit had rejected that claim in a case involving a class of about 250,000 current and former IBM employees. 06-652, Didden v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:11 am
Google is either paying its own employees to develop technology or it’s paying another company’s employees to do it. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:30 am
According to Robert Milligan, the former employee's breach of her non-disclosure agreements could qualify as a violation of the CFAA as it is currently interpreted. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 12:09 pm
JPS Elastomerics Corp, barred a former employee and his new employer not only from using the stolen trade secrets until such time as they are no longer trade secrets (if that should ever happen), but – for five years – from producing a similar product by any means. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
All employees within a class of employees eligible for the ICHRA must be offered reimbursement coverage on the same terms with limited exceptions that allow differentiation based on age, number of dependents, and status as a former employee. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(IPKat) (IPKat) IPO launches ‘Supply Chain Toolkit’ best practice toolkit for avoiding fake goods entering business supply chains (IPKat) Welsh patent applications: the results are in (IPKat) United States US General Government blocks release of documents on secret IP enforcement treaty, ACTA (EFF) Potential names for Obama IP team swirl; WTO IP Chief ‘imminent’ (Intellectual Property Watch) John W Thompson leading candidate for Commerce… [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
Brookstreet Securities Corp., Civil Action No. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
Maselli-Strickmode GmbH (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Alpex Computer Corp. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Gulf Oil Corp., 597 F.2d 936 (5th Cir. 1979). [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP) Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46) Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46) United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office) United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance) UK patent… [read post]
