Search for: "FRENCH V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The European Court declared the application admissible and not manifestly ill-founded ([25]), but concluded on the merits of the case that the conviction of the applicants because of breach of the French Copyright Act did not amount to a violation of Article 10 of the Convention by the French authorities. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 3:58 pm
Shemo v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:23 pm
Similarly, in Kita v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
The respondent's argument that D18 would not be part of the common general knowledge and cannot demonstrate an enabling character of ENGAGE® 8400 actually pertains to the merits of the discussion and is therefore not relevant for the admittance of D18.1.4 Under these circumstances, the Board has no reason to make use of its discretionary power under Article 12(4) RPBA 2007 to hold D18 inadmissible. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm
Nevertheless, the Guidelines and some Boards indicate that there is a prohibition of double patenting in one or more of the above situations, where protection is sought for the same scope of protection (using the same wording or wording with the same technical meaning) or even for overlapping scope of protection - the presumed prohibition being derived from Article 125 EPC (general principles of procedural law in contracting states) with the general principle… [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
The General Court gives lipstick shape mark a French kissGuerlain v EUIPO Case T-488/20 EU General Court (July 2021) Shape marks haven’t fared well in Retromark coverage over the years. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm
Roche Molecular Systems. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
French, Esq., of counselThe Law Office of Stephanie Adams, PLLC, attorneys for amicus curiae New York State Library Association, Stephanie A. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
French, Esq., of counselThe Law Office of Stephanie Adams, PLLC, attorneys for amicus curiae New York State Library Association, Stephanie A. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 3:52 pm
Merit agrees that the Letter Agreement formed a joint venture. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 9:53 am
The recent i4i v. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm
Italy 2011, Povse v. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 10:22 pm
Ashby Donald and othrs. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 12:36 pm
Here I explore Hak v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 6:11 am
Court of Appeal of Brussel, 5 May 2020, Mylan BVBA v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:12 am
Dohme v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
We believe there is merit in more broadly exploring what the United States can learn from comparative administrative law in general. [read post]
9 May 2015, 6:25 am
Legal System, 2nd Edition, by Curtis A. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:35 am
Under various Peoples Republic of China (PRC) laws and regulations on employment, several characteristics of individuals are protected from discrimination in employment, such as nationality, race, gender, religious belief and disability (Protected Characteristics). [read post]
