Search for: "FRIEDMAN v. COURT ON THE JUDICIARY" Results 41 - 60 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am by Sanford Levinson
  To be sure, Bickel was more than willing  to defend Brown v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:23 pm by Peter Vodola
  Are Wolpoff & Abramson, Mann Bracken and Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, providing only legal services to debt buyer clients or do they have a stake in the litigation which may be in violation of the Judiciary Law? [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:56 am by Rob Robinson
Judiciary Faces New EDD Rules - http://tinyurl.com/3borj3s (Gina Passarella) Are E-discovery Review Platforms a Serious Security Risk? [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Is it feasible for the judicial selection process to produce a formalist judiciary? [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
This is true even though the United States Supreme Court and the Canadian Supreme Court have different jurisprudence on freedom of religion. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 2:57 pm by Matt Bodie
Friedman and Lithwick sometimes seem to claim that the Court is bound by past precedent, as in this exchange: Here's another example: Roe v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:38 am by Gerard Magliocca
  The first involves the repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801, which was upheld in Stuart v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
In a post at the Ninth Justice, Dan Friedman reports that the Senate Judiciary Committee is moving towards scheduling Kagan’s confirmation hearing. [read post]