Search for: "FTC V. MICROSOFT CORPORATION,"
Results 1 - 20
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am
Seen through that lens, the FTC's complaint In the Matter of Microsoft Corporation, a corporation, and Activision Blizzard, Inc., a corporation (PDF) comes across as anemic from start to finish, unusually repetitive for such a short document, and generally unsubstantiated. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 11:01 pm
For convenience, let me show the two documents first and then compare them:In the Matter of Microsoft Corp., a corporation, and Activision Blizzard, Inc., a corporation: Answer and Defenses of Respondent Microsoft Corp.In the Matter of Microsoft Corp., a corporation, and Activision Blizzard, Inc., a corporation: Answer and Defenses of Respondent Activision Blizzard, Inc.Each complaint has three parts: introduction, item-by-item denials… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:28 am
The post FTC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 12:20 pm
The FTC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 1:54 pm
While FTC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am
Wilkinson is Microsoft's renewed motion to dismiss: DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am
As former antitrust enforcers and alumni of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), we are pleased to submit these comments to the FTC and U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 11:22 pm
Microsoft Corporation Complaint to Prohibit the Acquisition of Activision Blizzard by Microsoft corporation in Violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 1:58 am
First, the document: De Martini et al. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 10:08 am
Ira Rubinstein is here with us at the Berkman Center today to talk about Microsoft’s corporate policies on privacy. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 1:01 pm
In particular, Microsoft points to a Seventh Circuit decision in South Austin Coalition Community Council v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:44 am
(The previous sentence explains that a FRAND royalty for an SEP must reflect "the actual value of the patent".)In this context Microsoft cites Allied Tube v. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 5:17 am
After my bird's-eye view of the first FTC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 10:23 pm
This "gamers' lawsuit" against Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard (DeMartini et al v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Microsoft (personal computer and server software; tablets and other hardware; games and gaming devices; cloud services) was frequently mentioned, as well. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
By virtue of having followed the Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:20 am
First, the document:DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
The order to dismiss the Qualcomm class action(s) came one day after Judge Corley also made a decision (in a class-action matter that does not involve Qualcomm but also followed an FTC action) relating in part to yours truly's communications with Microsoft: DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 7:25 pm
Microsoft Corp., and Steele v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 7:05 am
The FTC cites to a Third Circuit decision, ZF Meritor LLC v. [read post]
