Search for: "Fabian v. State"
Results 121 - 134
of 134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2018, 1:22 am
This referral was made by the Court of Appeal of Paris with decision of 9 October 2018 in Santen v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
Article IV also clearly states that such decisions are to be taken by the Ministerial Council in accordance with the specific requirements for “decision-making” in the WTO Agreement, or in any of the covered multilateral trade agreements. [read post]
15 May 2017, 2:32 am
V. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
[iv] The General Court of EU in Hardware (Guangzhou) v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm
The intermingling of Industry 3.0 and 4.0 represents the state of matters in the current period of digitalisation of work. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:38 am
V. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:19 am
Thus, for example, price discounts aimed at recreating the right balance among spectrum fees are not considered State aid. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:22 am
Accordingly, the member states should support the right to education, in particular those facing disadvantages, or having special needs. [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) of the United States has won the first round of litigation against Qualcomm. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 5:00 am
One implication is that this could apply to state-owned enterprises. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:36 am
The rights of third-country nationals migrating to the EU have largely been constructed under the terms of Part Three, Title V, Chapter 3 TFEU, particularly arts 78-79 thereof. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm
I include those who are unemployed because, in most cases, unemployed people are now commonly assumed to be (paid) ‘job-seekers’ and may have certain social welfare entitlements which provide them with the most basic means for survival.[2] These distinctions may seem sharp and clear-cut as stated here. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:41 am
As a consequence, courts were urged to develop the notion of frustration of the contract, which allows for termination of an agreement when the circumstances are “in a fundamental respect different from those which were envisaged”.6)In the definition of Davis Contractos Ltd. v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:19 pm
Víctor M. [read post]
