Search for: "FaceBook.com, Inc." Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
PJ Kim - Drum Major Institute for Public PolicyJuan Maldonado - The Financial ClinicMichael Marion - Macy's Inc. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 8:48 am
Source: Facebook In Angel Fraley et al. v Facebook Inc, the US district Court of Northern California approved on 26 August a $20 million settlement to be paid by Facebook for putting users’ names and faces in “Sponsored Story” ads without their permission and without paying them. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:57 am
 The subpoena should be sent to subpoena@facebook.com or faxed to 650-644-3229. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by Sarah Sutherland
This appeal requires the Court to apply this test in a consumer context. [2] Deborah Douez is a resident of British Columbia and a member of the social network Facebook.com. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 3:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
The heightened standard for mandatory preliminary injunctions requiring the removal of posted materials from on-line platforms is discussed in Garcia v Google, Inc. (9th Cir. 2015). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:56 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Cf Hurley v Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc., 515 US 557, 574 [1995] ["the point of all speech protection ... is to shield just those choices of content that in someone's eyes are misguided, or even hurtful. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:56 pm by Eugene Volokh
[The hearing officer found that petitioner had engaged in "misconduct, neglect of duty and conduct unbecoming her profession” based on the comments and on the teacher’s allegedly “directing her friend, Joanne Engel, to provide false information to investigators by claiming to have written the comments on [petitioner's] Facebook.com webpage … so that [petitioner] would not get in trouble.” [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Erik Manukyan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit greenlighted a mix of privacy claims levied against Facebook in In Re Facebook, Inc. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
A recent trademark dispute between fitness-tech company iFIT inc. and lingerie retailer Victoria Secret shows that any everyday word (here, “SWEAT”) can qualify for trademark protection. [read post]