Search for: "Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP (US)"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2022, 4:44 am
DLA Piper LLP (US) . [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 3:10 pm
Lake joined after litigators at DLA Piper and the Buffalo firm Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman withdrew from the case. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:33 am
Fine Art Ltd. v Lacher, 115 AD3d 600, 601 [2014]), and requires a showing of “egregious conduct or a chronic and extreme pattern of behavior on the part of the defendant attorneys” (Savitt v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 126 AD3d 506, 507 [2015] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; Wailes v Tel Networks USA, LLC, 116 AD3d… [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 3:10 pm
Lake joined after litigators at DLA Piper and the Buffalo firm Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman withdrew from the case. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:22 am
The complaint otherwise failed to state a cause of action for breach of contract or violation of Judiciary Law § 487(1) (see generally Second Source Funding, LLC v Yellowstone Capital, LLC, 144 AD3d 445, 445-446 [1st Dept 2016]; Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird, LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 669 [1st Dept 2017]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv… [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 6:07 am
” (Face book, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP (US), 134 AD3d 610,615 [1st Dept 2015] [internal citations and quotations omitted].) [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 5:22 am
A violation of this provision “requires a showing of ‘egregious conduct or a chronic and extreme pattern of behavior’ on the part of the defendant attorneys that caused damages” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:33 am
The misconduct alleged by plaintiffs is also sufficiently “egregious” to support a Judiciary Law § 487 claim—consisting of the reiteration of allegations Balestriere knew to be false in multiple filings, even after receipt of information refuting these allegations and even after being sanctioned (see generally Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903… [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 3:56 am
The misconduct alleged by plaintiffs is also sufficiently “egregious” to support a Judiciary Law § 487 claim — consisting of the reiteration of allegations Balestriere knew to be false in multiple filings, even after receipt of information refuting these allegations and even after being sanctioned (see generally Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:38 am
” Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 {2d Dept 2015). [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 2:40 am
” lt is understood that “relief under a cause of action based upon Judiciary Law § 487 ‘is not lightly given”‘ (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610,615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2015], quoting Chowaiki & Co. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:54 am
The complaint otherwise failed to state a cause of action for breach of contract or violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (1) (see generally Second Source Funding, LLC v Yellowstone Capital, LLC, 144 AD3d 445, 445-446 [1st Dept 2016]; Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 669 [1st Dept 2017]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept… [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 4:30 am
Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity (see CPLR 3016[b]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615; Armstrong v Blank Rome LLP, 126 AD3d 427; Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
8 May 2018, 4:15 am
” Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP (US), 134 AD3d 610, 615 (1st Dept 2015) (internal citation omitted); Briarpatch Ltd., L.P. v Frankfurt Garbus Klein & Selz, P.C., 13 AD3d 296, 297 (1st Dept 2004). [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
. must be stated with particularity’ ” (Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at 838, quoting Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:09 am
” Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP (US), 134 AD3d 610, 615 (1st Dept. 2015) (internal citation omitted). [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:30 am
Many of the allegations in the complaint and the proposed amended complaint are made upon information and belief, which is “not sufficient to establish the necessary quantum of proof to sustain allegations of fraud” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:22 am
The allegations must be pied with particularity (see Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP (US), 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], Iv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [2015]; see Putnam County Temple & Jewish Ctr., Inc. v Rhinebeck Sav. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am
“‘Allegations regarding an act of deceit . . . must be stated with particularity'” (Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d at 838, quoting Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615). [read post]
