Search for: "Facebook, Inc. v. John Does 1-10" Results 1 - 20 of 74
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
That still does not negate the negligence — both direct and vicarious liability. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory… [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
On the other hand, countries are fighting to get their cultural property back to promote their own states’ national identities.[1] The disputed ownership of artifacts in western museums is a well-known global issue. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
That still does not negate the negligence — both direct and vicarious liability. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am by Bernard Bell
He asserted that he had used the three search terms and found no responsive documents on his cell phone, including his iMessage, WhatsApp, and Facebook accounts. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
The Privacy Perspective Blog has an article that asks the question, does the IPSO Editor’s Code need to be reformed to protect the relatives of the accused? [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 07567-21 Ranger v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (201), No breach – after investigation 07566-21 Ranger v Telegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 06518-21 Extinction Rebellion v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 06401-21 League Against Cruel Sports v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach – after investigation 05940-21 Cygnet Health… [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Mike Nagata, senior vice president of CACI International Inc.; retired Lt. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
”[10] Before it proceeded to address the unconscionability of the agreement the Supreme Court noted that the choice of law was the Netherlands but the parties chose not to bring evidence on Dutch law on unconscionability. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Lanter, 2020 ONSC 205 awarding damages against 10John Doe” defendants in respect of defamatory internet posts. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
  And where once hermeneutics formed the core challenge of law when it moved from theory to working system, now the "facticity" of data becomes the foundation on which data driven governance, and compliance, are founded. 1. [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
IP Kat covers the case of Warner Music and Another v TuneIn Inc a case concerning copyright infringement via the use of hyperlinks. [read post]