Search for: "Fair Trading Co. Ltd."
Results 21 - 40
of 490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2020, 11:54 am
This question is answered in Teraoka Seiko Co., Ltd v Digi International Inc. [2020] SGIPOS 1. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
Defend Trade Secrets Act One of the most significant developments of 2016 that will likely have a profound impact on trade secret cases in the coming years was the enactment of the Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”). [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:49 pm
Schaeffer of Franchise Valuations, Ltd., co-author of CCH Franchise Regulation and Damages.The recent case of Echo, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 7:53 am
Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Ltd. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:20 am
Supreme Court denied a petition for review of that decision.The decision in LG Display Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:36 am
Hoffman Enterprises Ltd. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
“Severe frustration” a common problem for litigants, but not moral prejudiceWirex Ltd v Cryptocarbon Global Ltd [2022] EWHC 1161 (IPEC) (May 2022)In a short 31 paragraph IPEC judgment, HHJ Hacon assessed the Claimant’s entitlement to damages having previously found the Defendants liable for trade mark infringement. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:13 am
”Indraprastha Power Generation Co. vs M/S Harvinder Singh & Co. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:13 am
DLF Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
CR Seasons Ltd., 907 F. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
Ltd. to pay Tomita Technologies International, Inc. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
However, it has been identified as a defence in the CJEU case of Budĕjovický Budvar, národní podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (C-482/09).Hacon HHJ drew on the summary of honest concurrent use from Victoria Plum Ltd v Victorian Plumbing [2016] EWHC 2911 (Ch) (see IPKat analysis here), which established that it would be possible for two separate entities to co-exist, such that the inevitable confusion that arises has to be tolerated.… [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 1:43 pm
Qualcomm has just announced that is "strategic partnership with Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
C-42), the Canadian parody exception reads: ‘fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright’.According to the Supreme Court in CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13, [2004] 1 SCR 339,para 50, fair dealing requires a two-step test: (1) the dealing must be for one of the purpose set out in the Act; (2) the dealing must be fair. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 12:48 pm
C-42), the Canadian parody exception reads: ‘fair dealing for the purpose of research, private study, education, parody or satire does not infringe copyright’.According to the Supreme Court in CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada, 2004 SCC 13, [2004] 1 SCR 339,para 50, fair dealing requires a two-step test: (1) the dealing must be for one of the purpose set out in the Act; (2) the dealing must be fair. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 12:29 pm
The Court rejected petitioners’ argument that the Court’s recent decision in Veriton Partners Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 9:19 am
The case in question, 3 Corporate Services Pte Ltd v Grabtaxi Holdings Pte Ltd [2020], was recently commented on its merits in the IPKat. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 2:58 am
Reddy’s Laboratories, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
Darren reports.* YouTube to defend clear examples of fair use, even in courtYouTube to litigate copyright infringement/fair use actions on behalf of users harassed by subject to inappropriate DMCA takedown requests? [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 11:52 am
The Court of Appeal considered the following factors raised by Halliburton: the circumstances of the appointment; the degree of overlap between the arbitrations; the financial benefit from the further Chubb appointment; the non-disclosure; the Arbitrator’s response to Halliburton’s concerns; and the views of a co-arbitrator, who expressed concerns about procedural fairness. [read post]
