Search for: "Fair v. Cochran"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2013, 9:23 am
In Fair v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:18 am
Ryan Tucker, and advocate Lisa Oken set out the ASA development in their summary as follows:"THE NEXT STAGE – TAKING IT TO THE ADVERTISING STANDARDS AUTHORITY (“ASA”)In a ruling handed down by the ASA Directorate on 3 February 2015 (M-Systems Group v Cochrane Steel Products; Case number 2014-1859F), the next stage of the saga between the parties was decided. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
I was a guest on this episode, together with Niall Ferguson and John Cochrane (moderated by Bill Whalen), discussing Students for Fair Admissions (from last Term), Missouri v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:01 am
Audry Linton v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
That sound everyone in Texas heard at around 9:17 a.m. this morning was Judge Cochran squealing with glee. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 4:54 pm
It is also now well-established that the motive of the employee is irrelevant; see Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets PLC [2016] UKSC 11 which is another leading case on vicarious liability, in which Morrisons were held to be vicariously liable for a violent assault carried out on a customer by one of its employees (it is fair to say that Morrisons has had a bad run of late with its employees). [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:37 am
Cochran, Jr. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 2:58 am
Cochran and Christine L. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Balkin, Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
Cochran v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
Through a blend of parody, fair use, and keen societal commentary, MSCHF, a collective known for its provocative and often controversial projects, has carved out a unique space in the art world, sparking discussions on the limits of creativity, ownership, and free speech.[2] In the realm of appropriation art, artists remix, repurpose, and reimagine existing works to create something new. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
It's also consistent with the Landrian v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 11:12 am
Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 7:27 pm
Seuss v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 7:08 am
In last week’s case (Cochrane v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:18 pm
Cochran, only to duck the issue when the plaintiff in that case died after argument. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
If the procedure (including an internal review) has been carried out an authority's decision can only be challenged by way of judicial review, see Manchester CC v Cochrane [1999] 1 WLR 809. [read post]
