Search for: "Fall v. State Bar" Results 81 - 100 of 4,850
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Will Baude
As the Supreme Court memorably put it in the case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
” Trump pushes back against any suggestion that it would be inconsistent with the purpose of Section 3 to hold that the president falls outside its scope. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:53 am by Eric Goldman
However, Choudhuri has not demonstrated—nor does the Court believe that Choudhuri could demonstrate—that the auction notices on Zillow’s website stemmed from “content development or creation” by Zillow The court concludes: to the extent that Choudhuri seeks to hold Zillow liable for posting auction notices on its website, the Court finds that these claims fall squarely within the purview of Section 230 and are barred as a matter of law This case bears… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
” In reality, Rule 1.8.5(a) does state the general bar on such payments. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm by Hina Shamsi
In Indiana, a tenured professor of political science and Middle Eastern studies was barred from teaching until next fall after incorrectly filling out a room request form for an event organized by the Palestine Solidarity Committee. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]