Search for: "Family Group, Inc. v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2012, 1:48 pm by WIMS
Circuit in the case of Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:06 am by PaulKostro
The United States Supreme Court held that, consistent with the First Amendment, a state could not “punish the truthful publication of an alleged juvenile delinquent’s name lawfully obtained by a newspaper. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 5:31 pm by Patricia Salkin
Plaintiffs, Avenue 6E Investments, LLC and Saguaro Desert Land, Inc. were business entities owned by members of the Hall family, who developed housing in Yuma, Arizona. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, the Supreme Court upheld the denial of a tax exemption to a university that banned interracial dating by its students, and that threatened to expel students who violated the ban.[7] Likewise, in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At Lawfare, Steve Vladeck looks at KBR, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am by Editor Charlie
  Established in 1931, SGA has for 90 years successfully operated with a two-word mission statement: “Protect Songwriters,” and continues to do so throughout the United States and the world. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 7:22 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
In support of the commonality requirement of Rule 23(a)(2), Plaintiffs cited directly to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm by Law Lady
BOYNTON-JCP ASSOCIATES, LTD., d/b/a BOYNTON BEACH MALL and SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., Appellee. 4th District.Child custody -- Time sharing -- Order modifying parenting plan to suspend mother's time-sharing during father's week to remedy her noncompliance with previous parenting plan is reversed because it fails to reflect that the change is temporary as the oral pronouncement held -- Remand for clarification that remedial custody arrangement is temporary -- Attorney's fees --… [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am by Jordan Brunner, Amira Mikhail
The injury in fact should be “actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical” (Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) As I had expected, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the Stolen Valor Act case (United States v. [read post]