Search for: "Famous Smith v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: False advertisement through third parties may constitute false marking, but facts must be pled with particularity: United States of America, ex. rel., et. al. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The minority in Kay would, in a nutshell, have made gateway (b) somewhat wider (Lord Bingham's not quite so famous [39]). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by chief
The minority in Kay would, in a nutshell, have made gateway (b) somewhat wider (Lord Bingham's not quite so famous [39]). [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
Yet another challenge to original-intent originalism was posed by Jefferson Powell's famous article, The Original Understanding of Original Intent, published in 1985. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am by Kelly
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist)     Australia I thought cats were colour blind... [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
(IP Law Blog) US Copyright – Decisions District Court C D California: Politico’s use of Henley songs copyright infringement – not fair use: Henley v Devore (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) 8th Cir: Famous Dave’s magic words: copyright assignments and settlement agreements: Thomsen v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
Smith Distributing Company, Inc. entered into an agreement with the U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 11:13 pm by Andrew & Danielle Mayoras
Can the Anna Nicole Smith Estate be lucky enough to revive her case in the United States Supreme Court twice? [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am by Erin Miller
Yesterday two sisters who were petitioners in the famous Brown v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
Today in the United States it is also Memorial Day, a day in which we remember those soldiers who have died in service to our country. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP)   United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:28 pm
To quote, I am sure someone famous, “We will see you in Court! [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
Perhaps the most rigorous defender of the original intentions version of originalism has been Richard Kay in a series of very careful articles.Yet another challenge to original-intent originalism was posed by Jefferson Powell's famous article, The Original Understanding of Original Intent, published in 1985. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 7:55 pm
  Perhaps the most famous probate litigation case ever, Marshall v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]