Search for: "Farkas v Farkas"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2010, 12:05 pm
The first request granted was in Bush v. [read post]
2 May 2007, 9:26 am
Yesterday's decision by the First Department in Farkas v Farkas, 2007 NY Slip Op 03762 should be a strong wake up call to all attorneys to strictly comply with all time frames in which to take a procedural step in litigation. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:48 pm
Cheour v Pete & Sals Harborview Transp., Inc., 2010 NY Slip Op 06614 (2d Dept. 2010) “While Dr. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 2:54 am
In R. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:24 pm
DuBrin, Special Assistant Monroe County Public DefenderIn People v Farkas (_NY_, 2011 NY Slip Op 01318 [2/22/11]), the Court of Appeals decided a very important 30.30 case - against the defendant- but in so ruling confirmed principles that will often help defendants seeking to move to dismiss a superseding accusatory on 30.30 grounds. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:37 am
Farkas's second and third issues are overruled. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 4:39 pm
. 'Losses like this affect morale and unit cohesion, especially since these soldiers don’t understand why they’re fighting,' said Evelyn Farkas, the top Pentagon official for Russia and Ukraine during the Obama administration... 'It is stunning, and the Russians haven’t even gotten to the worst of it, when they hit urban combat in the cities,' [said] Representative Jason Crow, Democrat of Colorado.... [read post]
9 May 2007, 10:00 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Farkas v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:59 pm
See Estate of Sam Farkas, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 11:28 pm
At the very end of August, this weblog hosted a guest comment by a German attorney, Thomas Farkas, in which he gave a strikingly positive slant to the deeper meaning of Advocate General Wathelet's Opinion in the controversial Nestlé v Cadbury dispute over registration of the three-dimensional shape of the Nestlé Kit Kat chocolate biscuit bar. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:47 am
The initial burden of proving that a party's medical condition is in controversy is on the party seeking the information, and it is only after such an evidentiary showing that discovery may proceed.Case: Farkas v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 4:00 am
Flores v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 7:35 am
Hicks v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 1:50 pm
The judge held that the "combination of drugs" method: "resulted in arbitrary abrogation of a statutory and substantive right of a condemned person, in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Section 16, Article I of the Ohio Constitution (due process clause)" See State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
The same happened in the aftermath of the Puffin/Penguin case [United Biscuits v Asda, noted here]. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:09 am
Supreme Court’s 1994 opinion in O’Melveny & Myers v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm
(Starting with Bush v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:51 pm
Prentky, Sexual Predator Laws: A Two-Decade Retrospective Mary Graw Leary, Kennedy v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:06 pm
Supreme Court decision in Village of Euclid v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:54 pm
" CIVIL PROCEDURE, FAMILY LAW, JUDGMENT ENFORCEMENT Farkas v. [read post]
