Search for: "Farley v. Goode"
Results 1 - 20
of 97
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2024, 9:37 am
Case Citation: State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:33 am
., and Michael Farley v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:50 pm
" In 2004, however, the Ninth Circuit had the good sense to hold that Devlin applies to opt-out cases, see Churchill Village, L.L.C. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:02 am
Here, Professor Farley offers her take on Iancu v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:13 am
Professor Christine Haight Farley of American University - Washington College of Law, and Professor Lisa P. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
By Guest Bloggers Margaret Chon and Christine Haight Farley [Margaret Chon is a Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law, and Christine Haight Farley is a Professor of Law at American University Washington College of Law.] [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 5:30 am
Aguayo v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:45 pm
That makes good sense in this case. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
Thanks to Christine Haight Farley for organizing! [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:16 am
by guest blogger Christine Haight Farley Because it is grading season, when I read the Second Circuit’s per curiam decision in Vans, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 3:55 am
See Cyens v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:43 am
Professor Farley and I propose a trademark fair use defense that would apply to any informational or expressive use of language or designs claimed by another as a mark in connection with any goods or services. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Clark (1871) that are no longer good law. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:53 am
Lee v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 7:23 am
A far cry from Sears v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 2:20 pm
Renna v. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 9:38 am
Over at The Fire of Genius, Joe Miller has a series of posts, inspired by the briefs in KSR International v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:13 pm
v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
(See the briefs and amicus briefs filed in the Jack Daniel’s case, and Part I of my paper with Professor Farley.) [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:54 pm
Radostitz then cited Kyles v. [read post]
