Search for: "Farley v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 95
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:26 am
Farley of American University - Washington College of Law (download here)). [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:25 pm
We have had 460,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, India, Australia and Ireland making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:54 pm
With a new judge presiding, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
The Tenth Circuit has not yet ruled on whether such a First Amendment right of access exists in civil cases, see United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
” In United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:11 pm
Over the week of Nov. 12, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 6:07 am
Jen Patja Howell posted this week’s episode of Rational Security, covering the foreign policy crisis that Jamal Khashoggi’s disappearance has created, potential Iranian plans for attack in Europe, and U.S. expansion of foreign aid to counter China’s influence: Sarah Grant provided a summary of last week’s military commissions, focusing on the reversal of the abatement in United States v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 6:49 am
Farley on September 28, 2018. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:21 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:30 am
United States to Gill v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
" United Nuclear Corp v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:36 am
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:47 am
S.A.S. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:33 pm
Did the Tam Court gloss over the language in Walker v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
For instance, the Supreme Court held in U.S. v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 10:56 am
And it bothers, or bothered, the United States Government that it might happen — including for reasons that have gotten zero attention by those discussing this case. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am
Yet, keeping scandalous and immoral matter outside the contours of the United States trademark registration program has been part of federal law even longer, going all the way back to the 1905 Act, so there is a large mountain to climb in saying the Constitution has been violated as part of the federal government’s trademark registration program for more than 100 years. [read post]
