Search for: "Farmer v. Lands"
Results 81 - 100
of 527
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2008, 3:09 pm
In McElmurray v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:47 pm
R. v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 9:12 am
Before the Civil War the area was settled by ranchers and cotton farmers and grants were made of the surrounding land. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 7:36 pm
Plaintiffs Pulte Home Corporation and Shiloh Farm Investments, LLC spent $50 million on purchasing land and $12 million on TDRs from Montgomery farmers, with the hope of developing the property. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 11:19 am
Idle-O Apartments v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:39 am
Therefore, the appellants failed to establish that the project would cause serious and irreversible harm to soils.Read the decision at: Bovaird v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:00 am
Read the Court of Appeal decision at: R. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:47 am
GURT was developed under a research and development agreement between Agricultural Research Service of the USDA and Delta and Pine Land Company (Information obtained from International Seed Federation). [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:15 pm
Haaland (Land Exchange Agreement; Mootness) Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:31 am
’s majority decision in Semelhago v. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 12:50 pm
Consumers can import produce, and expect contributions or subsidies to prop up farmers who work the land but six of seven years. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 11:45 am
It turns out that a combination of easy money and federal subsidies (particularly crop insurance) has facilitated intense speculation by both farmers and investment firms in the US farmland market, with quite predictable results: Because higher prices for crops means farmers could make more on their land, many are using their growing profits to buy more land. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 8:51 am
Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 7:25 am
Goodrum v. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
So, the Snyder–Farmer Post of the American Legion (the “Post”) assumed responsibility. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 3:13 pm
Chisholm v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 9:30 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 8:17 am
The trial judge determined that this was not a reasonable expectation and dismissed the action.Read the decision at: Vieraitis v Fitzgerald. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:59 am
Background The case concerns a piece of land situated in Maidenhead (referred to in the judgement as the “Application Land”) which in 1972 was sold by a farmer to a development company who already owned neighbouring land, together forming a wider plot referred to as the “Exchange House Site”. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
Part V concludes. [read post]
