Search for: "Farrand v. Farrand"
Results 21 - 29
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Civic Education, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 5:17 am
’” 3Mazer v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am
” This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Before responding to some of the questions and concerns raised in these remarkable essays, please allow me a moment to note how positively the reviewers responded to the collection: “Kurt Lash now stands alongside Max Farrand in doing extraordinary work to further constitutional knowledge by making a critical portion of our past more accessible. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:24 am
(9 PJM 383-84, emphasis original) Compare these passages with Resolution VI of the Virginia Plan, whose separate clauses are numbered below for easy reference: 6. [1] Resolved that each branch ought to possess the right of originating Acts; [2] that the National Legislature ought to be impowered to enjoy the Legislative Rights vested in Congress by the Confederation [3] & moreover to legislate in all cases to which the separate States are incompetent, or in which the harmony of the… [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Late last Friday evening, a policy brief written by 24 year old Derek Khanna was posted to the website for the Republican Study Committee (RSC), a caucus of conservative House Republicans. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
[The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail have already been addressed by extant scholarship, including our scholarship. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am
Finally, I'll also explain why the article's new account of the original understanding of the Necessary and Proper Clause can serve as a useful framework for addressing some of the issues presented in Bond v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
