Search for: "Fashions Four v. Fashion Place Associates" Results 161 - 180 of 273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
  Despite having been –Van Halen for nearly thirty years, it seems Ms Van Halen may find herself somewhere between rock n’ roll and a hard place. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am by Paul Rosenzweig
” For those who don’t want to read the entire statement, here is the short bullet summary:  In my statement, I want to make four basic points: First, the reality of data analytics has fundamentally changed. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm by Wells Bennett
 The contrast was evident throughout the morning, and in four particular exchanges—which we highlight below. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:37 pm by Ron Coleman
  It takes place in an online space where people not only speak, but listen. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
  The High Court recently adopted such an approach in AAA v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2012] EWHC 2103 (QB). [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm by Ken White
Schmalfeldt continued to demonstrate that he is closest to his sweaty-palmed Happy Place when he is describing degradation of others: So, it's not anal sex (as a practice) to which these small, frightened men object. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am by Eric
  Indeed, the whole point of the story was to show famous scenes featuring Hollywood icons, digitally altered to wear modern fashion styles. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:23 pm by Afro Leo
       The Adidas three stripe trade mark is so notorious, recognisable and distinctive that there is no likelihood that a consumer of the goods concerned would, when confronted with trainers featuring two or four parallel stripes in a decorative fashion, be confused into believing that they are the goods of, or are associated with, the appellants; and4. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:09 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The methodologies approved by the First Department in the case of Rodman v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 11:27 am by Lyle Denniston
Two years ago, in the case of American Electric Power v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 1:57 pm by Thomas Merrill
On Tuesday in Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  If four Justices want to keep the case, they typically can, since those same four Justices were all who were needed to grant review in the first place (pursuant to something known as the “Rule of Four. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:51 pm by Mark Weidemaier
On February 27, the Second Circuit is scheduled to hear the next phase of arguments in NML v. [read post]