Search for: "Fdic v. Smith*" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2010, 1:20 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
Santa Lucia Noonan v Harrington Davis v Frederick Stella Maris v Catholic Health FDIC v Great American Univ Mortgage v Wurttember Kirschner v KPMG Katrina_Decision Lloyd_s_Brief Zurich_dec [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was immediately appointed as receiver. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Financial Institution Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (“FIRREA”) sets a minimum limitations period for claims that have not yet expired at the time of the bank’s closing of 3 years for tort claims and 6 years for contract claims.[14]  As receiver, the FDIC enjoys a number of other powers typically not afforded to plaintiffs, such as broad power to issue subpoenas.[15] In addition, defenses that might prevail against other plaintiffs are unlikely to… [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:46 pm
Sure, maybe they were just really nervous about the FDIC status of the bank (or whatever), and sure, maybe they were planning to rob the thing with a potato instead of a gun. [read post]