Search for: "Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2019, 12:03 pm
National League, in which the Court unanimously held that federal antitrust laws did not apply to professional baseball. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 11:44 pm
In the 1920’s, the Supreme Court decided a case called Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
In 1922, in Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:32 am
In Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:55 am
Federal Base Ball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:51 am
National League of Professional Baseball Clubs, et al. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
The Second Circuit invalidates the FCC’s indecency policy in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:24 pm
For example, MLB has enjoyed total immunity from antitrust law since 1922 when the Supreme Court held in Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
Although an exemption is currently enjoyed by professional baseball (Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore v National League 259 U.S. 200 (1922)), the Supreme Court made clear that if given an opportunity to revisit the decision they would not find that professional baseball enjoyed such an exemption. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 10:42 am
The Supreme Court created the exemption in 1922 in Federal Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. [read post]
