Search for: "Federal Insurance Co. v. Housing Investment Corp"
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Health Care Reform: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE DERAILS PART OF HEALTH CARE REFORM LAW, Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Alamo Water Supply Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 5:11 pm
A recent federal district court decision, Perez v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 5:11 pm
A recent federal district court decision, Perez v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:18 pm
Templo Fuente De Vida Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being… [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:12 pm
Corp. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Contrary to common wisdom, federal law does not impose a legal duty on large employers to offer their employees access to a health insurance plan, or to subsidize such a plan. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
In 2015, the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division – First Department, was faced with two matters, both of which addressed whether bonds issued to entities formed for the purposes of investing and trading in securities, covered losses the entities sustained by investing in Madoff’s Ponzi scheme.[7] In 2009, Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 federal felonies and was sentenced to 150 years in prison, the maximum allowed. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
However, interest in purchasing this type of insurance did not develop until 1939, when in New York Dock Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
Sierra Railway Co. (1907) 151 Cal. 113, 115 [plaintiff is entitled to “[s]uch reasonable sum . [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am
Teachers Federal Credit Union v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:26 pm
More specifically, California state courts as well as federal courts in the Ninth Circuit have concluded (in light of Luther v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 12:48 pm
Islam v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
Union Pacific Railroad Co.). [read post]
18 May 2007, 11:22 am
Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:07 pm
Is anyone on that list bothering your house? [read post]
