Search for: "Federal Insurance Co. v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2009, 12:15 pm
In No. 08-640, Federal Insurance Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:57 pm
E. 2d 622 (1991). [3] Wilburn Boat Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:57 am
Agape Senior Primary Care, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit was asked to review a case arising in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Columbia that presented a more unique issue. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:55 pm
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:59 am
Cardozo’s line from from Schechter Poultry was “re-tweeted” as recently as 1995, in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:17 pm
On August 31, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States granted a petition for writ of certiorari in The Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 8:13 am
The style of the case is, Landing Council of Co-Owners v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 10:43 am
Accordingly, the district court remanded the case of LLOG Exploration Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:29 am
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in Tampa has dismissed a lawsuit that was filed against the parent company of an insurer. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Dist. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 3:00 am
In Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 7:46 am
The style is, Bil-Sonic Trading Co., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm
The post Vacatur and United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 5:52 am
United States (D. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 11:07 am
The federal court decision is not binding on state courts in Washington. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit addressed whether, under federal admiralty law, a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract can be rendered unenforceable if enforcement is contrary to the “strong public policy” of the state whose law is displaced by the clause. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 1:50 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, applying California law, has held that an “insured v. insured” clause exclusion in a D&O policy for claims asserted by an insured against an insured did not preclude the insurer from paying for the entire defense costs incurred by insured and non-insured claimants. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit addressed whether, under federal admiralty law, a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract can be rendered unenforceable if enforcement is contrary to the “strong public policy” of the state whose law is displaced by the clause. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:08 pm
Darius Sturmer, contributor to Antitrust Law Daily.A physician and a pair of physical therapy clinics, along with their principals, could have violated the federal RICO Act by orchestrating an alleged scheme to defraud State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. through the filing of claims for physical therapy services that were medically unnecessary or not actually performed, the federal district court in Ann Arbor, Michigan has decided (State… [read post]
