Search for: "Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission" Results 41 - 60 of 188
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm by Megan Russo
The Biden Administration’s decision halts the progress of the mining project until the Administration can more fully review the environmental impact of the mining project. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:54 pm by Vanessa Schoenthaler
The final mine safety rules and amendments require that “operators” of “coal or other mines” (as those terms are defined in the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”)) disclose, on a mine-by-mine basis, information regarding: violations of mandatory health or safety standards that could significantly and substantially contribute to the… [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:21 pm by Unknown
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.htmlKehano v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm by Sri Medicherla
The post Week in Review first appeared on The Regulatory Review. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:04 am by Eugene Volokh
Might this be a mine subject to the Mine Safety and Health Administration instead of OSHA? [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 4:21 pm by Pamela Wolf
In a footnote, the EEOC attorney also pointed out that GINA’s prohibitions and requirements do not apply to: the Armed Forces Repository of Specimen Samples for the Identification of Remains; limit or expand the protections, rights, or obligations of employees or employers under applicable workers’ compensation laws; limit the authority of a federal department or agency to conduct or sponsor occupational or other health research in compliance with regulations and… [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 10:00 pm
Union steps in at request of Crandall Canyon miners UMWA says it's now representing workers at nonunion Crandall Canyon mine on safety issues and in any discussion with Mine Safety and Health Administration involving rescue or recovery of six men trapped in mine. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin S. Daniel
Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) proposed delaying an MSHA rule that sets standards for examining the working places in both metal and non-metal mines. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 11:11 am by Adeline Rolnick
Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) proposed delaying an MSHA rule that sets standards for examining the working places in both metal and non-metal mines. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
The Department of Labor (DOL) proposed two new rules aimed at improving the safety of miners, covering both examinations of mines prior to the beginning of work, and exposure of miners to harmful exhaust—the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) stated that effective examinations are crucial to preventing injuries and improving safety conditions, citing data that shows that between January 2010 and December 2015, more than 60 percent… [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:18 am by Heidi Henson
In a footnote, the EEOC attorney also pointed out that GINA’s prohibitions and requirements do not apply to the Armed Forces Repository of Specimen Samples for the Identification of Remains; limit or expand the protections, rights, or obligations of employees or employers under applicable workers’ compensation laws; limit the authority of a federal department or agency to conduct or sponsor occupational or other health research in compliance with regulations and… [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 6:28 am by Robert J. O'Hara
For example, staff losses at the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) and the Mine Safety and Health Administration have strained resources, particularly amid the increased threats to workplace health and safety created by the pandemic. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:13 am by Allan Blutstein
Agency for International Development; Export-Import Bank; Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission; and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Leonard Jernigan
Anthony River Inc. has 15 business days from receipt of the citations and proposed penalties to comply, meet with OSHA or contest the findings before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:26 am by Paul McAndrew
Anthony River Inc. has 15 business days from receipt of the citations and proposed penalties to comply, meet with OSHA or contest the findings before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:35 am by Roy Black
He and Blankenship did not conspire to impede the Mine Safety and Health Administration. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 8:39 am by WIMS
<> Mine Safety: Basis for Proposed Exposure Limit on Respirable Coal Mine Dust and Possible Approaches for Lowering Dust Levels, April 09, 2014 - What GAO Found The Department of Labor's Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) appropriately did not use recent trend data on coal workers' pneumoconiosis (CWP) as a basis for its proposal to lower the. . . [read post]