Search for: "Federal Trade Commission v. Consumer Health Benefits Association et al"
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
The transcript consumes not quite the entirety of three pages, 25 lines each, double-spaced. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
Brief in opposition of respondents California Pharmacists Association et al. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
Those who care about health--their personal health, the environment's health, and the health of local economies--must understand that the fate of healthy local food is on the line. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, since the 1970’s there has been a substantial reduction in the rate of deaths and injuries associated with consumer products. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
Dietary supplement manufacturers should be familiar with the requirements under both DSHEA and the Federal Trade Commission Act that they have substantiation that labeling and advertising claims are truthful and not misleading. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
---Community Development ClinicClass Unique #: 28930 Course #: 397C Instructor: Way Et Al. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Kent School District, et al.; Kent School District, et al. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
Riegel et al. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its… [read post]
