Search for: "Federal Trade Commission v. Scientific Living"
Results 21 - 40
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
It will look back to several important recent Supreme Court decisions, in particular Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
Patent landscape analytics may prove you wrong (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Why sinking markets could mean real opportunities for patent acquirers and licensees (IAM) Global - Copyright Copyright still viable, at least for top authors (IP finance) Understanding the backlash cost in copying someone else's work (Techdirt) Africa Designers from all OAPI (Organisation Africaine de la Propriete Intellectuelle) countries to benefit from fee reductions (Afro-IP) (WIPO) WIPO and… [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:01 am
Kohm, Associate Director of the Enforcement Division, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission He doesn’t speak for the FTC as a whole or any particular commission. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
One candidate for causation is the Federal Trade Commission's first set of guidelines restricting health claims in cigarette advertising. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The “unofficial canon” phenomenon poses a set of normative, epistemological, and methodological challenges for a field that purports to advance universal, generalizable, scientifically sound insights. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:59 am
In the music sector, we have launched the Fair Trade Music project to address this issue. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
(The Product Naming Blog) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court C D California: Federal registration owned by someone else no defense to cybersquatting: Monex Deposit Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
– ownership of IP: (Dilanchian), Consultant or contractor IP: (Dilanchian), IP and general business law issues: Website terms of use reduce risk: (Dilanchian), Plant breeder’s rights actions in the Federal Court will now be regarded as IP cases for the purpose of docket allocation: (IPwar’s), Ajinomoto v NutraSweet – inventive step and costs: (IPRoo), Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft 2020 submission:… [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Like in Bantam Books v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
nco’s refinery, a pollutant classified by the federal government as a group one-carcinogenic toxic substance.3 Once Ontario’s Ministry of the Environment (“MOE”) discovered the true extent and levels of Inco’s nickel depositions, Port Colborne became the subject of extreme environmental scrutiny, risk assessments, scientific testing, regulatory intervention, unprecedented media publicity and health studies lasting almost 2 St Lawrence Cement; Imperial… [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ICANN approves custom gTLDs: (Out-Law), (ipblog.ca), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Managing Intellectual Property), High-tech companies pool resources to fight trolls: (IAM), (Techdirt), (Patent Prospector), (Ars Technica), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) eBay fined €38.6M over counterfeit sales on their site: Vuitton… [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 1:47 pm
Federal Trade Commission, 281 F. 744 (2d Cir. 1922), Royal Baking had for 60 years produced a “superior” baking powder under the brand name “Dr. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Leading this charge is the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office) Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46) Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango) Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark… [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm
[1]See, e.g., Lauren Lefer, Scientific American, “Your Personal Information Is Probably Being Used to Train Generative AI Models | Scientific American (October 2023); Congressional Research Service, “Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law” (2023), online at: LSB10922 (congress.gov) (“AI systems are “trained” to create literary, visual, and other artistic works by exposing the program to large amounts of data, which may include… [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:04 am
In light of the Supreme Court's rulings in Gall and Kimbrough, which had come down in the interim, the majority held in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (Afro-IP), (Managing Intellectual Property), Rwanda: Four years after AIDS drugs bill passed, first low cost meds may head to Rwanda: (GenericsWeb), US: Abbott’s first quarter lobbying tab hits $880,000: (Patent Docs), US: House Bill would expand federal drug pedigree requirements and preempt state requirements: (FDA Law Blog), US: Purchasing Canadian drugs and patent infringement: Litecubes decision: (Patently-O), US: Neuralstem seeks to reopen stayed patent… [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
Similarly, the commercial speech cases grant agencies like the Federal Trade Commission significant power to restrict commercial advertising that is false or misleading to consumers—indeed false or misleading commercial speech is understood to be categorically outside the scope of First Amendment protection. [read post]
