Search for: "Federal Trade Commission v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2009, 8:02 am
Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 746 (2d Cir. 2003);  Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 9:28 am by Jonathan Pompan and Helen Chen
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) plays a significant role in regulating consumer financial services providers and vendors, including advertisers and marketers. [read post]
A recent ruling on a case brought by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) against 1-800 Contacts scrutinizes the brand’s ad tech playbook through an antitrust lens, calling into question the legality of certain private agreements. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 9:41 am by TOTM Admin
Legal Challenges to the Rule Are Likely Once It Is Finalized The proposed rule represents a significant expansion of the FTC’s regulatory reach in two respects: First, the Commission had not previously held non-compete agreements to be unfair methods of competition under the Federal Trade Commission Act, until its recently announced settlements. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Justice Roberts and the majority cite the circumstances in Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:14 am by Unknown
Smith (Federal Jurisdiction; Indian Country Land Status) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlUnited Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 7:15 am
Justice Ginsburg also authored a concurring opinion in which she argued that Smith v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:56 pm by Jeffrey May
Court of Appeals in Atlanta today rejected the Federal Trade Commission’s challenge to a patent litigation settlement between brand name and generic drug companies as an unlawful agreement not to compete in violation of Section 5(a) of the FTC Act. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
  Abstract: On August 11, 2020, the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:34 pm by Kim Zetter
A gang of unknown thieves has stolen nearly $10 million using micro charges made to more than a million credit and debit cards in an elaborate multiyear scam, according to a lawsuit filed by the Federal Trade Commission in March. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
 Nikos tells all.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Smith noted that he has lived under a cloud of suspicion related to his trading for the past six years as a result of CME, CFTC, and DOJ investigations and now the current charges. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Supreme Court agreed to decide whether Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which expressly gives the FTC authority to seek injunctive relief, also authorizes the FTC to seek monetary relief, such as restitution. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
The drafters of the motion have now prepared a detailed reply to Wouter's comments, which is handily summarised in this post.* When three is company: trilogue happy with proposed EU trade mark reformsWondering what might be the fate of the European Commission's proposals for trade mark reform? [read post]