Search for: "Federal v. Levine" Results 61 - 80 of 1,214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2008, 4:35 pm
Supreme Court "Federal preemption" case, Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:21 pm
Levine, No. 06-1249 In a tort action based on an injury due to the medical use of Wyeth’s drug Phenergan, judgment for respondent Levine is affirmed where Federal law does not preempt Levine’s claim that the drug’s label did [...] [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:01 am
Levine, in which the federal government and pharmaceutical manufacturers argue that Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of prescription drug labeling preempts state "failure-to-warn" litigation, and in Altria v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 8:51 pm
Diane Levine today, raising questions about the limits of federal preemption.... [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:32 pm by Brian Wolfman
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2008), the Supreme Court held that the same kind of suit against manufacturers of brand-name prescription drugs is not preempted by federal law. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:30 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously in Levin v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 5:25 am
In Eiseman Levine Lehrhaupt & Kakoyiannis, P.C. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:03 am
In the Celexa/ Lexapro MDL, the court denied without prejudice the defendant’s preemption motion, to allow further discovery and expressly because the United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Levine v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 10:26 am
A number of entities have continued to weigh in as amici in the Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:03 am
Levine, the Supreme Court held, 6-3, that federal approval of warnings on prescription drug labels does not preempt state law tort suits alleging that such... [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 6:27 am
AEI's Michael Greve is caustically critical of the brand of federalism protected by the Supreme Court majority in Wyeth v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
Supreme Court today granted certirorari in Levin v. [read post]