Search for: "Federer v. County of Sacramento (1983)"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2006, 11:32 am
County of Sacramento, click here: To review the Ninth Circuit's decision in Smith v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:13 am
Sacramento County, 2007 U.S. [read post]
21 May 2007, 7:57 am
" Per the 14th amendment issues, the opinion states: The parties agree that our consideration of § 1983 claims in the context of a police chase of a motorcycle is largely controlled by the Supreme Court's holding in County of Sacramento v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 8:10 am
Sacramento County, 2007 U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
Boeing Co., 708 F.2d 1406, 1410 (9th Cir. 1983)). [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
In the seminal McCulloch v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
This high-speed police pursuit case deals with the shocks the conscience standard set forth in County of Sacramento v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:49 pm
Now it has, holding:Accordingly, it is no longer possible in light of Lingle and [County of Sacramento v.] [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:49 pm
Now it has, holding:Accordingly, it is no longer possible in light of Lingle and [County of Sacramento v.] [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:59 am
In April 2015, in a case entitled Ventura County Agricultural Association v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:33 am
The Complaint also says that Juror Number One was “the jury foreperson in a gang-related attempted murder trial in Sacramento County Superior Court”. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The EIR related to general planning and conservation steps resulting from Los Angeles County’s prior approval of a 12,000 acre specific plan and neighboring 1500 acre conservation area in Ventura County. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City of San Diego v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
County of Marin (2004) 125 Cal.App.4th 1098). [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:11 pm
In 1987, a Sacramento County jury convicted Mr. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:46 am
County of Sacramento v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
§ 1983 for interrogating a minor using solely verbal techniques that did not involve any threats.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (Crowe)Brief in opposition (Houser)Consolidated reply to brief in opposition (McDonough) Title: Blum v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
