Search for: "Fee v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 20,949
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
Does 1-2 et. al. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:52 am
Preferred Prescription, Inc. v Health Mgt., 252 AD2d 414,416 [1st Dept 1998]). [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 3:02 am
Also, see Contract Services Employee Trust v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
Other states Mis-classification of gig workers has been a major issue in numerous states. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:05 am
McDaniel v. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 8:47 am
Com. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 1:50 pm
State Water Resources Control Bd. (2021) 72 Cal.App.5th 873, 880; and Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm
Cherokee Nation (Filing of Fees) Jardine v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 12:44 pm
Parra (Jose) v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Casto’s article Robert Jackson’s Critique of Trump v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:49 am
In Turk, the court looked to two decisions from the state of Washington. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:01 am
In OG v AG [2020] the court has gone further to state that conduct should be taken into account, not just where it is unjust, but also where the impact is financially measurable. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
New Section 261(a)(1) is being added in light of Crispo v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:39 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Minor Third-Order-Procedure Decision in Walters v. OpenAI Large Libel Models Lawsuit
1 Apr 2024, 12:29 pm
Substance: Walters sued OpenAI, LLC for libel in Georgia state court. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
” See United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:35 am
I’m pleased to write about the two cases again at the finale of their ten-year-long merits litigation odysseys (except in the unlikely event one or more losing defendant obtains leave to reargue or leave to appeal to the New York State Court of Appeals). [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 11:30 am
It may also service loans and collect "reasonable fees" for doing so. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:45 am
Defendant was not discharged for cause, nor did it charge legal fees for any work associated with the motion practice ensuing from the supplemental disclosures (see Decolator, Cohen & DiPrisco v Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, 304 AD2d 86, 91 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
