Search for: "Felder v City of New York"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2012, 4:21 pm
In Felder v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
Thus, the burden shifted to plaintiff to raise a question of fact requiring a trial (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068 [1979]). [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 10:11 am
Index 108503/04
2007 NY Slip Op 06809Matter of Felder v City of New York
Index 112051/05
2007 NY Slip Op 06810Matter of Newman
Per Curiam
M-3449
2007 NY Slip Op 06811Matter of Zimmerman
Per Curiam
M-3567
2007 NY Slip Op 06812 [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:51 am
While most of the underlying causes of action were time-barred before the plaintiff retained the [*2]defendants, the plaintiff's claim under 42 USC § 1983 arising from malicious prosecution was viable at the time the defendants commenced the federal action on the plaintiff's behalf (see Palmer v State of New York, 57 AD3d 364, 364; Pendelton v City of New York, 44 AD3d 733, 737). [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 11:25 am
Last Thursday, the First Department held that even bringing a petition to file a late notice of claim against the City of New York must be brought in Federal courts not State Supreme Court - Matter of Felder v City of New York, 2007 NY Slip Op 06810 The petition was brought by a New York City Police Officer who assisted in rescue, recovery and removal operations at the Ground Zero World Trade… [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
While most of the underlying causes of action were time-barred before the plaintiff retained the [*2]defendants, the plaintiff's claim under 42 USC § 1983 arising from malicious prosecution was viable at the time the defendants commenced the federal action on the plaintiff's behalf (see Palmer v State of New York, 57 AD3d 364, 364; Pendelton v City of New York, 44 AD3d 733, 737). [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:24 am
Thus, the burden shifted to plaintiff to raise a question of fact requiring a trial (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068 [1979]). [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Carter Journalism Institute at New York University, Katie Roiphe, describes Ms. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
We've praised courts that have gotten this issue right - most significantly the New York Court of Appeals in the Arons case. [read post]
