Search for: "Feldman v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2011, 2:43 am by SHG
Marshall’s most famous decision — Marbury v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:02 am by Jonathan J. Fox and Matthew D. Simone
On May 28, 2019, United States District Judge Martin Feldman issued a sixty-four page Order and Reasons which granted motions to remand filed by Plaquemines Parish and the State of Louisiana in The Parish of Plaquemines v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:02 am by Matthew D. Simone and Jonathan J. Fox
On May 28, 2019, United States District Judge Martin Feldman issued a sixty-four page Order and Reasons which granted motions to remand filed by Plaquemines Parish and the State of Louisiana in The Parish of Plaquemines v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:02 am by Jonathan J. Fox and Matthew D. Simone
On May 28, 2019, United States District Judge Martin Feldman issued a sixty-four page Order and Reasons which granted motions to remand filed by Plaquemines Parish and the State of Louisiana in The Parish of Plaquemines v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Also, Feldman did not have a direct, pecuniary interest in the malpractice action, and thus was capable of acting as a notary in that action (see New York State, Department of State, Division of Licensing Services, Notary Public License Law at 7 [June 2016], http://www.dos.ny.gov/licensing/lawbooks/notary.pdf [accessed Aug. 28, 2017]). [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:51 pm
Feldman adds that “some speculated” that Kennedy’s liberal vote in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 6:50 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
First, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine deprives this Court of subject-matter jurisdiction over any claims that essentially seek review of the previous state-court action. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:26 am by Susan Brenner
Even limited to the United States, the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Court grants review of two cases, likely to be among the term’s more important for business, to clarify the limits of state court personal jurisdiction when none of defendants’ actions relevant to the dispute took place in the state [Jim Beck on Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]