Search for: "Feldman v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 407
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2017, 4:25 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at Hughes v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am
United States, in which the justices considered the limits of tax-law obstruction-of-justice charges. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
JOAN BAYEv.MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.Civil Action No. 17-4789.United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
JOAN BAYEv.MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.Civil Action No. 17-4789.United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am
” Also in an op-ed for The Hill, Ashley Baker urges the court to “be particularly cognizant of the potential for judicial overreach” in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a challenge to the constitutionality of an offense. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
” In an op-ed for the Mississippi Business Journal, Ben Williams debunks “recent indistinct and misleading news reports” suggesting that “the Supreme Court of the United States has … asked the State of Mississippi or Governor to defend the battle emblem on the Mississippi flag. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 5:05 am
[v] (So has our mean-ass host.) [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:17 am
In an op-ed at Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman discusses Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:30 pm
United States tells us, the basis for impeachment is a political question, meaning that impeachment effectively means whatever Congress decides, and the courts will not review or challenge the determination. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:30 pm
United States tells us, the basis for impeachment is a political question, meaning that impeachment effectively means whatever Congress decides, and the courts will not review or challenge the determination. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm
We ran into related issues during the pre-Obergefell litigation on marriage equality, when the United States Attorney General and some State Attorneys General declined to defend the constitutionality of marriage and marriage-related laws that were discriminatory, and other parties (generally representatives of legislative factions and state or local officials) stepped in to do so, with fairly limited success. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 am
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:07 am
The Knight Institute is representing filed seven plaintiffs in the United States District Court For The Southern District Of New York. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:35 am
At Just Security, Marty Lederman disputes the government’s contention in its reply brief that the connection between a foreign national and a United States person or entity “must be ‘substantial,’” calling “[t]hat adjective … a limitation of the SG’s own creation, one not found in the Court’s opinion. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:23 pm
United States A Derry priest has been granted permission to sue an American Catholic Diocese for defamation. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:21 am
On Tuesday, the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University filed its lawsuit on behalf of seven plaintiffs in the United States District Court For The Southern District Of New York. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:31 am
” Also at Slate, Jessica Brand argues that Turner v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
” See, e.g., Noah Feldman, Non-Sectarianism Reconsidered, 18 J.L. [read post]
